Almost every business has a trademark. At a minimum, the name of the business usually serves as a trademark.
Trademarks can be one of the most valuable assets of a business and thus need to be selected carefully and vigorously protected. How much is the Coca Cola trademark worth? It has been estimated to be worth 25 billion dollars. Are consumers willing to pay more for Coca Cola than a house brand cola? Yes. The answers to these questions demonstrate the value of trademarks.
An example of how valuable trademark protection can be occurred with the type of trademark known as “trade dress,” which is discussed in the next section. I had a client with a very successful hair styling apparatus but did not yet have a U.S. Patent to assert against a major U.S. company that copied the appearance of my client’s product. My client believed that the marketplace would confuse the two products. Even before a patent issued that covers the competitor’s product, the client was able to have the copyist modify the appearance of its product to avoid confusion in the marketplace.
A trademark is a word, phrase, symbol, design, or a combination of these that identifies the source of the goods of one company and distinguishes them from the goods of others. For example, “Canon” is a trademark for cameras, which are goods. A service mark is the same as a trademark, except that it identifies and distinguishes the source of a service rather than the source of goods. For example, “Bank of America” is a service mark for banking services. “Rolling Stones” is a service mark for a band. Throughout this book, the terms “trademark” and “mark” refer to both trademarks and service marks. Many business people refer to trademarks as “brands.”
Trademarks take many forms. They can be word marks such as “Ivory,” letters such as “IBM,” symbols such as the Sun Maid raisin maid, sounds such as the Microsoft Windows boot up sound, and logos such as the Google logo.
A very useful type of trademark is commonly referred to as “trade dress.” Trade dress is the appearance of a product or its packaging. For example, the classic Coca Cola figure 8 bottles (Exhibit 4-3) and the Perrier bottles (Exhibit 4-4) are examples of packaging trade dress. These bottles distinguish the products of Perrier and Coca Cola from the products of others, and thus serve as trademarks. Similarly, the color pink for insulation has been held to be a trademark belonging to Owens-Corning. Trade dress rights can be even more valuable than patent rights in a product because trademarks can last forever; patents have a limited term. More recent trade dresses of note include the lacquered red sole on Christian Louboutin shoes (Exhibit 4-5), and the hard hat design by Bullard (Exhibit 4-6), both of which have trapped many an unwary importer at U.S. Customs.
A tradename is not a trademark. For example, Google Inc. is a tradename. Grammatically, trademarks are adjectives (Kodak brand cameras) while tradenames are nouns (Kodak Inc. manufactures cameras). Although tradenames are protectable under unfair competition law, there is an important distinction between tradenames and trademarks. This distinction is that trademarks can be registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, but tradenames cannot. In view of the value of trademark registration as discussed below, it is important that businesses develop registerable trademarks.
A trademark serves as the source identifier for goods and services. Therefore, when selecting a mark, the more distinctive the mark, the more likely that it is protectable. Marks are classified by their distinctiveness as follows, in descending order of inherent distinctiveness: (1) fanciful and arbitrary; (2) suggestive; and (3) descriptive terms and surnames. Generic terms can never be a trademark.
Fanciful marks are terms invented for the sole purpose of functioning as a mark. Such marks comprise words that are either unknown in the language (e.g., Pepsi, Exxon, IBM) or are completely out of common usage (e.g., Flivver).
Arbitrary marks comprise words that are in common use but, when used to identify particular goods or services, do not suggest or describe a significant ingredient, quality, or characteristic of the goods or services (e.g., Apple for computers; Old Crow for whiskey).
Suggestive marks are those that, when applied to the goods or services at issue, require imagination, thought, or perception to reach a conclusion as to the nature of those goods or services (e.g., Ivory for soap). Thus, a suggestive term differs from a descriptive term, which immediately tells something about the goods or services.
Descriptive marks are those that describe an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of the specified goods or services (e.g., “Bed & Breakfast Registry” for lodging reservations services, “Coaster-Cards” for a coaster suitable for direct mailing). A geographic term can be descriptive if the primary significance of the mark is that (1) it is a generally known geographic location and (2) the goods or services originate in the place identified in the mark. For example, “Durango” is descriptive of tobacco, but “Atlantic” is not descriptive of a magazine.
Surnames are marks that are primarily recognized as a last name. Surnames that are valuable trademarks include “Gallo” for wine and “Otis” for elevators.
Generic terms are terms that the relevant purchasing public understands primarily as the common or class name for the goods or services (e.g., aspirin, elevator, escalator). Generic terms can never serve as a trademark.
Fanciful, arbitrary, and suggestive marks are automatically protectable.
Descriptive terms and terms that are primarily merely a surname are not protectable without proof that they have acquired “secondary meaning,” i.e., the primary significance of the term in the minds of the consuming public is not the product but the producer. Secondary meaning can be proven in the U.S. Trademark Office in either of two ways: (1) proof that the mark has become distinctive because of substantially exclusive and continuous use in commerce for five years; or (2) factual evidence such as long-term use of the mark, substantial advertising expenditures, and substantial sales.
The most important factor in choosing a mark is whether it helps to sell. Once you come up with a list of candidates, you should consider the following factors:
There are many marketing consultants, public relations firms, and the like that can assist in selecting trademarks. A low-cost alternative that has worked for many start-up clients is:
A trademark availability search is important before adopting a mark to avoid violating the rights of another and to make sure you are choosing a registerable mark. There are more than 4,000,000 marks on the Federal Trademark Register as of 2012, and only about 100,000 words in the dictionary. It is more than a truism that if you can pronounce it, it is probably taken. Doing a search before adoption is always recommended. While a trademark application does not cost much, fighting off a trademark infringement claim can be very costly.
Sometimes executives perform their own initial low-cost screening search by using Google or another search engine and checking for already taken trademarks at the U.S. Trademark Office website (www.uspto.gov). However, identical mark searches are inadequate, as trademark coverage is broader than that. My experience is such searches are about 90% effective: 90% of the time, if a screening search indicates a mark is available, it is. That means about 10% of the time it turns out the mark is not available and should not have been selected. In order to avoid infringement, the search should be extended to look for possible confusingly similar marks, and this phase of the search requires legal analysis and working knowledge of the likelihood of confusion factors. It is better to have a lawyer do the screening, at least in the federal and state trademark databases. A screening search can usually be accomplished in one day.
A full U.S. trademark search utilizes commercial databases such as those provided by Thomson Reuters and others. These searches are much more comprehensive in that they include state trademark registration, domain names, news articles, and more. However, such searches cost more and can take a few days, unless you pay even higher costs. Therefore, full searches are typically performed only after you have narrowed down the trademark candidates to a small number. I find such searches are 99% effective: 99% of the time, if a full search indicates a mark is available, it is. That means only about 1% of the time the mark is not actually available and should not have been selected.
Trademark searches are meant for determining if a potential mark is likely to cause confusion among the consuming public. Under U.S. law, a single set of rules named “likelihood of confusion” governs whether the use of one mark infringes another. You cannot obtain a federal registration and can be sued for trademark infringement if there is a likelihood of confusion between the use of your mark and an already registered mark. Moreover, even if there is no registered mark that creates a problem, because even nonregistered marks and domain names have some level of protection, it is possible to infringe a non-registered mark or domain name if there is likelihood of confusion. That is why full trademark searches are desirable.
The likelihood of confusion test seeks to determine, when two similar marks are used on similar products or services, whether the consuming public will be confused into believing that both came from the same source. Since the test can be quite subjective, the courts have generally broken down the test into a number of objective factors.
Whether there is a likelihood of confusion depends on weighing several factors that vary from case to case. These factors can include
The likelihood of confusion test is highly subjective. A comparison of the many trademark cases suggests that this test is applied by the courts in a highly inconsistent manner. Accordingly, whether a third party’s use of a mark containing a word such as rate, which is a commonly used term, will be considered to create a likelihood of confusion is difficult to predict and can never be predicted with absolute certainty.
The strength of a mark (factor 4) is important in determining “likelihood of confusion” and is affected by several factors. Arbitrary and fanciful marks of a highly distinctive nature (i.e., “Google”) are protected more broadly than are descriptive marks having a relatively low degree of distinctiveness. Exclusive use over a long period, with extensive sales or promotion, also can result in a strong mark. Conversely, use of the same term by numerous different parties is an indication of a weak mark.
Similarly, you cannot use or register a mark that dilutes a famous mark. For example, use of a famous mark such as “Google” for any goods or services, even if they are unrelated, is likely to dilute the value of the Google mark and thus is prohibited.
If you adopt a mark without a search and find out later that it conflicts with someone else’s mark, the significant marketing efforts you invested in the meantime would be wasted.
There are many advantages to registering a trademark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. There are two types of registration available: registration on the Principal Register and registration on the Supplemental Register. The Principal Register is for fanciful, arbitrary, and suggestive marks, as well as descriptive terms and surnames that have acquired secondary meaning. The Supplemental Register is for descriptive terms and surnames that do not have secondary meaning. The following chart presents representative benefits of both types of federal trademark registration:
A Dozen Benefits of Federal Trademark Registration
|Benefits of Registration||Principal
|1. Nationwide priority
– No longer need to establish rights by first use in each and every territory
|2. Automatic federal court jurisdiction so your infringement case can be heard in federal court rather than state court
– Federal judges are generally more experienced than state court judges
– Smaller case backlog
|3. Litigation advantages
– Automatic evidence of ownership, validity, continuous use in commerce, and exclusive right to use the mark
|4. Registration can become incontestable
– Eliminates most grounds for canceling a registration
|5. Use of ® symbol
– National constructive notice of exclusive rights
– Blocks claim of innocent infringement from defeating monetary damages
|6. Increased damages and attorney fees
|7. Statutory damages and criminal sanctions for counterfeiting||Yes||No|
|8. Recordation with customs to block unauthorized
|9. Foreign registrations can be based on U.S. registration||Yes||Yes|
|10. Prevent cybersquatting, i.e., third parties using a registered trademark as part of a domain name||Yes||Yes|
|11. More likely potential infringers will leave you alone
– The registration appears in trademark searches, so others will stay clear
– The Trademark Office usually refuses registration of confusingly similar marks
|12. Establishes legitimacy as trademark owner
– Marketing advantage
– Approval by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office means that judge, jury, and government agencies will be more convinced of your protectable rights in the mark
In addition to federal registration, all states have a system for registration of trademarks, which generally is less expensive than federal registration. State trademark registration is not as valuable as federal registration because it does not provide nationwide protection and is usually bypassed for most marks.
State trademark registrations do have their use. It is useful if a very fast registration is needed, since most states register marks faster than the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. For trademarks that do not qualify for federal registration because use of the trademark is not in interstate or foreign commerce, state registration may be the only option. For example, a local barbershop with little interest in expanding outside of Montana and no out-of-state customers need not incur the cost of federal registration. A state of Montana registration can be all that is needed.
You can register a trademark by filing an application for registration with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The application can be based on actual use of a mark. Alternatively, the application can be based on a bona fide intent to use the mark. Therefore, actual use is not necessary to file a trademark application. However, no registration will issue until you submit proof of use.
The following are the steps that occur when registering a trademark:
It is advisable to use ® by a mark once it is actually registered. The symbol ® cannot be used until a registration certificate actually issues; it cannot be used just because an application is pending, even if that application has been allowed by the Trademark Office.
A registration lasts forever if all post-registration maintenance documents are timely filed. It is necessary to file a Declaration of Use under Section 8 between the fifth and sixth years following registration to maintain the registration.
It is also desirable for trademarks registered on the Principal Register to file a Statement under Section 15 to make the registration incontestable at the same time. Such a statement can be filed if the registered trademark has been in continuous use for five consecutive years since registration.
In addition, it is necessary to file a combined Declaration of Use and Application for Renewal under Sections 8 and 9 between the ninth and tenth years after registration, and every 10 years thereafter.
Unlike the registration-based system in many countries, the U.S. trademark system is largely based on use. You acquire common law rights in a mark in the geographical location where you trade by using the mark. Registration extends the scope of the rights in the mark, but registration and maintenance of trademark registrations generally require use of the mark. The use has to be a bona fide use, as in regular sales and shipment. Samples or occasional uses do not suffice. It is important to retain evidence of the earliest use.
For federal trademark registrations, the qualifying use has to be in commerce that can be regulated by the U.S. Congress, generally interstate or international commerce. The applicant or registrant has to present sworn declarations of such use (or continued use) in the initial application and subsequent renewals. In general, no federal trademark registration will issue until and unless a sworn statement of use has been filed. The only exceptions are federal registrations based on foreign trademark applications or registrations. Under those situations, a federal trademark registration can be obtained without showing use of the mark in the United States. However, before the end of the sixth anniversary, the foreign registration still has to show Use in Commerce in order to maintain the registration.
Sworn statements attesting to the Use in Commerce are required during certain critical junctures of federal trademark application/registration, including those (a) filed as part of an application based on use; (b) filed after a Notice of Allowance issues on an application based on intent to use; and (c) filed with each renewal of a registration. If the products and services listed are broader than what the applicant has actually used the mark on, the resulting registration can be subject to cancellation.
Continued nonuse of a trademark over a substantial period may be presumed to be abandonment of the mark.
Proper use is needed. For goods, the mark needs to be used on the goods, packaging for the goods, a display associated with the goods, or on a website where the goods can be purchased. For services, the mark needs to be used in a manner associated with the services, such as a website, promotional materials, menus, order forms, a sign in front of a location providing the services, or invoices.
Trademark rights are territorial. This means that for the most part, trademark rights in the United States arising from use and registration do not provide protection against infringement in other countries. If a trademark is to be used outside the United States, it is advisable to register the trademark in all countries where the mark will be used. This is particularly important because in many countries trademark rights are based on registration. In the absence of a registration, it is not possible to stop an infringer.
Also, in many foreign countries, pirates register trademarks of U.S. trademark owners and hold the owners hostage—the legitimate owner has to pay exorbitant sums to register its trademark. Also, distributors have been known to pirate trademarks.
By treaty, most countries will accord a trademark application the same filing date as that of a U.S. application if the application is filed within 6 months of the filing of the U.S. application.
When filing foreign applications, there are multiple options. How best to obtain foreign registration depends on many factors, including the countries of interest, cost, number of classes and the specific countries of interest. To determine the best strategy, it is important to involve an attorney knowledgeable in this area.
Registration of a mark in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is only the first step in developing valuable trademark rights. Other steps to take include the following:
Our lawyers’ prior firm was recognized as among the best law firms in 2014 by U.S. News & World Report
National Tier 1
Los Angeles Tier 1
Litigation – Intellectual Property
Litigation – Patent
Top Patent Firms 2013